Jonathan Cahn Prophetic: The Mystery Of Barbie, Ishtar, and Smashed Babies!
The Mystery Of Barbie, Ishtar, and Smashed Babies!
Jonathan Cahn shares another prophetic update – Barbie, Ishtar, & the Smashed Babies – Could a doll from the 1950s and a Hollywood movie be connected to an ancient Mesopotamian goddess – and to the end times? Could there actually be a dark mystery behind Barbie?
Monday, August 14, 2023 – The Ant’s Obstacle
Scripture tells us “Go to the ant” meaning, learn from the ant. If an ant is bringing a piece of food to the colony and you put something in its path, it doesn’t drop the food and say, “What did I do to deserve this? I can’t take it anymore. Take me now Lord! Send a shoe to kill me!” Sometimes we get discouraged so easily. Something obstructs our path and we get discouraged and give up. Temptation comes and we give in or we lose the zeal we had in the Lord because something hindered us. But the ant just keeps going without batting an eyelid. Obstacles come up – they happen. Don’t throw up your hands and stop. If something’s of God, keep going. Fight for it. You keep going in righteousness and love. Persevere in what’s good. Ants persevere for a bread crumb. You need to show the same righteous perseverance for God. Ants persevere for crumbs, but you persevere for something better–for loving, serving, doing, hoping, standing and overcoming. Because you need to be at least as strong as an ant.
Could a doll from the nineteen fifties and Hollywood movie be connected to an ancient Mesopotamian goddess and to the end times.
Could there actually be a dark mystery behind Barbie? This is Jonathan Khan, and it’s time for an expose.
The biggest movie of the season is about a girl’s doll from the end of the nineteen fifties, Barbie, but the fact that Hollywood could take that all and turn it into an attack on half of the human race, on marriage, on life itself is a sign of just how sickened our culture has become.
I’m gonna give you a glimpse of just one scene that’s gonna give an expose to all the others, and it’s gonna take it to another dimension.
A Ben Shapiro did a review of the movie to show how profound the movie is in its dumbness, but I’m gonna take it to another realm, that of the spiritual.
First, this has to be the most widely distributed anti man movie ever made.
Never before, Has there been a major motion picture directed at children, girls, to the effect of indoctrinating them against men?
Just a few years ago, this motion picture could not even be made as a children’s movie, but it shows you how rapidly our culture is changing.
Or rather deteriorating. What kind of movie it actually is is gonna be revealed in the text from its actual dialogue.
I’m gonna read it. It comes from the lips of Barbie herself. She says this.
By giving voice, to the cognitive dissonance required to be a woman under the patriarchy you robbed it of its power.
Let me say that again. By giving voice to the cognitive dissonance required to be a woman under the patriarchy, you robbed it of its power.
What kind of human communication is that? It’s not. It’s certainly not normal human communication.
It’s the kind of sentence you find in a handbook of radical feminism or a film made by Joseph Stalin’s revolutionary Council or the arts for the propagation of Marxist octrip.
And that gives you an idea of what we’re actually dealing with.
Some people would say, well, the movie’s just about fun, so why are you treating it so seriously?
Well, that’s the point. It’s not about fun.
If it were, you would never have such words and phrases and sentences. That reveals something very serious.
When you think of entertainment and children’s entertainment, the first two words that come to mind are not cognitive dissonance or the patriarchy.
No. Those are words that are used in propaganda and brainwashing.
And yet it’s aimed at your children, particularly at your daughter.
And focusing it all on a doll is a brilliant way to propagandize or brainwash children.
And because children are impressionable, such things do and will have an effect as they plant seeds that will impact the future, even of our culture.
What about the continual use of the word patriarchy?
It’s presented as something to be taken as an absolute reality.
In this context, it’s a buzzword employed in the writings of radical feminism as a specter responsible for all the evils in the world.
It’s a word used by radical feminists, many of whom hate men, and that it’s used over and over again in this movie is no accident.
Because the movie depicts men as evil or dangerous, at best they’re presented at the beginning just as jerks, useless inferior creatures with no real purpose.
And then after experiencing the, quote, real world, the men, the evil creatures that they are, begin to take over a Barbie land.
The men brainwash the women into submission, uh, into being wives as in marriage, which radical feminism views as something to be destroyed, or agreeable girlfriends, another evil.
Why? Because men are evil. That’s what men do. Men must be defeated in this movie.
The idea of men and women actually loving each other or needing each other or complimenting each other is an anathema.
Marriage is rejected for the sake of the sisterhood.
Women must separate themselves from men in favor of being with women.
Thus, women are not to need men as they can fulfill all the functions of manhood by themselves without men.
And men likewise are not to need women as they can presumably fulfill all the functions of womanhood by themselves without women.
Now imagine a movie aimed at boys that depicted women as inferior useless and evil creatures that had to be conquered, and boys were men had to separate themselves from them.
What would be the reaction. And yet Hollywood is vilifying half of the human race. And it’s okay.
So the victory here is when the women conquer the men. How do they do it by manipulating them?
Because men are not only prone to evil, but to extreme stupidity.
And to fighting each other, since men are always ready to explode into violence, and all this is a common technique of propaganda films.
Communist propaganda presents capitalists as the problem, antagonists bent on evil. Give them an inch.
They’ll take over the world, and they’ll oppress and subjugate the common people the proletariat.
In Nazi propaganda, the problem is the Jews, who are also bent to evil, give them an inch, they’ll take over society.
They’ll take over the world. They’ll subjugate the aryan races.
It’s the same thing here, except that the antagonist here, the dangerous evil doers are half the human race.
And those whose existence with regard to women is actually linked to love and family and life in real life.
The separating of man and woman in this movie is not an accident any more than it’s an accident that one of the Barbies in the movie is actually a transexual.
Or that Barbie alludes to gay masturbation among the Ken’s in a movie aimed at children.
What kind of culture pushes this on children? A sick culture. But it goes deeper.
And here’s the reveal, and it’s there at the very opening of the movie. It’s all there.
The movie opens with a scene of girls playing with baby dolls.
The narrator says that since the beginning of time, girls have played with dolls, But note the word but, leading into the idea that there’s a problem in this.
What is the problem? She says, but the dolls were always and forever, baby dolls. Always and forever.
Baby dolls are now a problem. And they were an endless, relentless, interminable problem. Just as important are the visuals.
The girls are shown with dolls caring for them as would their mothers holding them, nurturing them, feeding them combing their hair.
And interestingly, the girls appear unhappy somber or miserable, as if they’re engaged in an act of slavery that they’re forced to be part of.
Which is interesting because the scene depicts girls playing with dolls, note the word playing.
You play because you wanna play. It’s something enjoyable. Something you wanna do.
Fun, but the film inverts that and depicts the play as slavery, another subtext of radical feminism, and something else.
The opening is taken from Stanley Kubrick science fiction two thousand and one, a space odyssey.
That opening, what does that opening scene focus on?
Apes, Look at the apes here as they wake up, so the girls now wake up.
So now the little girls are put into the place of apes. It’s not an accident. It’s not incidental.
It’s central to the scene and to the message. The girls are as apes.
In Kubrick’s film, the apes represent the primitive.
So in Barbie, girls who play with baby dolls are represented as primitive, unenlightened.
Other words, motherhood is primitive. Women as mothers, mother and child, it’s a primitive unenlight and negative state.
Again, the doctrines of radical feminism.
In Kubrick’s movie, to answer the primitive state an object appears, a monolith, an upright rectangular stone slab.
The apes are puzzled disturbed in awe. It’s there to change them away from their primitiveness, their lowly state.
So to answer the primitive state of women, as in motherhood, an object peers as a monolith, but it’s Barbie.
She stands above them as a colossal goddess or a towering idol of a goddess, and she’s there to transformed them from their primitive state linked to motherhood.
In two thousand and one, the apes cautiously approached the object, touch it, and back away.
In Barbie, one of the girls, or primitive ape people, cautiously approaches the object just like the apes, touches the leg of Barbie and backs away.
In two thousand one, the effect of the object is to transform the ape away from primitiveness, apeness, into enlightened apes, and the enlightened apes use bones to kill other apes.
But in Barbie, the effect is even more profound. Because in Barbie, she wakes at them.
The girls are mesmerized and transformed by her spell.
As the ape lifted up the bone to kill an animal or an ape, the one girl lifts up her baby doll that she’s been caring for.
And what does she do? She smashes the baby doll against another baby doll And against the rocks, the head of the baby cracks open, explodes.
You see the decapitated head of a baby against a rock.
Just as the ape smashed the bone into the head of a dead animal carcass.
And so the baby’s head is decapitated while another baby is smashed into it and onto the ground.
And in every direction, is an explosion of flying baby pieces.
In two thousand and one, the ape throws his stick into the air.
So the girl then throws into the air, the sky the baby to transform it into the words, Barbie.
This is the opening of the movie Barbie. It’s all there.
In the very first scene, all that you need to know about the movie, it’s all there. It’s all exposed.
With all its sugar coating and pink colors and smiles.
This is the ultimate spirit behind the movie, and we’re gonna go even deeper.
We’re gonna expose it with something even deeper.
I’m gonna come back to this scene at the end, but understand it.
We have to look at the mystery of Barbie. Where did she come from?
Where where did she what’s her origins? Well, the word Barbie means stranger or foreigner.
Where did Barbie come from? Came from another land. She came from postwar Germany.
She was taken from a German doll named Bill Lily.
Her first appearance as a is a character with a fortune teller.
Bill Lily was a form of a sex doll. She was even sold in sex shops.
Parents considered her inappropriate for children.
She flouted sexual morality, She was depicted as a sex worker, a prostitute.
So Bill Lilly came to America in the form of Barbie.
Look at the two.
Look at the pattern of Build Lily’s clothing.
Now look at the pattern of Barbie’s clothing when she first appeared. That’s how she first appeared.
It’s the same outfit you see in the god like image of Barbie at the beginning of the movie.
You see it in the first image of Build Lily. Yes. Barbie was based on a prostitute.
Now let’s go even deeper. What does Barbie have to do with an ancient Mesopotamian goddess?
I wrote of this key in the return of the Gods.
When a civilization turns away from god, it doesn’t become neutral or empty.
When it turns away from the spirit of god, other spirits enter into it.
The principle is actually recorded in the Bible in a parable given by Jesus about a spirit that comes out of a man and then returns to the man with seven more spirits.
So when a culture or civilization that has known god departs from god drives his spirit out, the house does not remain empty.
Other spirits enter into it, the same spirits that were cast out of it.
That is the foundation of the book, the return of the gods.
Now, one of the most ancient of these spirits that I reveal in the book, is that of a goddess known in the Bible as Ashtor or Aztoroth.
In sumer, she was called Inanna. In Babylon, she was called Ishtar.
Ishtar was the goddess of sexuality, sexual immorality. She’s depicted. She was always depicted as a young woman.
She was depicted as a young woman on her own independent.
She was often depicted as taking roles traditionally assumed by men. She was not the goddess of marriage.
She was rarely linked to marriage, Her ways were generally averse to marriage or motherhood.
She was the goddess of women who were, overall, not married. Her ancient literature was pornographic.
Mesopotamian culture was filled with her images and idols figurines, little, figures that people kept in their houses.
Girls would have undoubtedly looked up to her as a model.
As with ishtar, Barbie is also depicted as an iconic young woman.
She’s the most widely disseminated figurine of a young woman on earth.
And since the time of the figurines of ishtar.
Her origins were that of a sex doll as ishtar was the goddess of sex. Ishtar was a prostitute goddess.
She was the goddess of prostitutes and a prostitute herself.
So Barbie was based on a prostitute doll Bill Lily.
Ishhtar was depicted, and said, as a female independent of males who took on roles and functions traditionally assumed by man so to Barbie, Ishtar was rarely connected with marriage or motherhood, so too Barbie.
A prostitute weakens marriage, and so the worship of Ishtar was of to marriage and the spirit of ishtar, weaken it along with motherhood, even in our culture now, the return of the goddess.
And so the coming of Barbie represents and Harold are turning away from the ideal of marriage and motherhood.
And so the girls open the Barbie movie by smashing their babies.
As Mesopotamian girls looked up to Ishtar, as a model, so modern girls have looked up to Barbie as a model.
Ishtar was famous for having a boyfriend. His name was Tamuz.
Barvey is famous for having a boyfriend. His name is, of course, Ken.
Tammuz was always a secondary character, always in the shadow of ishtar in effect an accessory to ishtar’s mythology.
Tamos and his various incarnation were symbols of emasculated man.
So Ken was always a secondary character, always in Barbie’s shadow and accessory. Of Barbie.
Ishtar was the active agent in her mythology while Tamaz was more passive and bland.
Barbie is the active agent in her lore, and Ken is the more passive bland one.
In the return of the gods, I open up the ancient inscriptions about ishtar.
Where it says, she grinds away the masculinity of men.
Now look at the Barbie movie and look at Ken and the men in the movie. What does it do?
It grinds away the masculinity of men. The men there are devoid of masculinity.
The spirit of Star inhabits our culture and seeks exactly this to grind away the masculinity of men and the femininity of women.
Ishtar dominates and subjugates her lovers. She even destroys Tamos.
In the movie, Barbie, Ken is vanquished along with the other men.
Ishtar is depicted as defying male authority, so to the doll from which Barbie Sprang billed Lilly.
Ishtar sought to bend break and subvert conventions, roles, and moral parameters so too did build Lilly from which Barbie originated.
What about the term and concept of the patriarchy that keeps coming up in the movie?
The movie rails against the patriarchy. Ishtar or Inanna was the daughter of the ancient god Anu.
He was the head of a pantheon of gods of patriarchy.
Ishtar or Inanna continually defied the authority of the patriarchy, and thus the war against the patriarchy.
It was in the nineteen sixties that America began intentionally removing god from its culture.
Barbie was introduced into America just at that moment as the nineteen sixties were about to begin.
And it was in the nineteen sixties that her popularity skyrocketed.
Ishtar was the goddess sexuality, and it was the nineteen sixties in which came the sexual revolution.
And in which also came the dramatic weakening and destruction of marriage.
The movie advocates that women be separated from men and men from women, whether it’s Barbie’s rejection of Ken and a marriage proposal to be with women.
And and the war or separation of men and women in Barbieland comes into play throughout the movie.
In the return of the gods, I write of the spirits that accompanied Ishtar, and I share this ancient inscription quote.
They tear away the wife from the man’s embrace. Again, they tear away the wife from a man’s embrace.
And I write in the book So the goddess’s most dramatic return to the world would be joined to the spirits that separated man from women and woman from man.
And that would work towards the deconstruction of marriage and the disintegration of the family.
So this spirit and the spirit of the goddess tears men away from women and woman away from men.
They take a wife from a man’s embrace and a husband from a wife’s embrace.
So the spirit inhabiting our culture now removes men from women and women from men.
In the movie, the women take up all the important roles of society, and the men are separated to meaningless pursuits.
So how do you remove men from women and women from men?
You do it through the weakening and destruction of marriage. You do it through divorce.
You do it by telling men and women they don’t need each other.
By telling them that the other is a hindrance to them.
You do it by telling them that they can perform every role of the other, and you tell them that they can replace the other without the other men can replace women and the functions of women, and women can replace the functions of men.
You replace them with same sex sexuality where men separate from women to be with men and women from men to be with women.
You replace them by telling them that one can become the other or be transitioned into the other.
That was ishtar. And that is the movie Barbie.
The subtext is men and women don’t need each other and are actually hindrances to each other, and men should become separated from women and women from men.
And the fact that you have illusions to homosexuality or trans sexuality is all part of it.
The movie Barbie is a manifestation of the spirit that’s been indwelling and happening America.
Increasingly, since the nineteen sixties, since the time Barbie came. Am I saying that Barbie is ishtar? No.
But I am saying that the spirit of the goddess will appear and will manifest in a multitude of manifestations.
The gods were icons of their culture.
And so the metamorphosis of American and western civilization is gonna manifest in the changing of its icons.
Barbie is an icon and is a manifestation of that spirit and that metamorphosis.
Even the movement away from the dolls of babies, and little children to a doll that came from a sex toy is part of it.
It represented the beginning step, the first step, the step of women away from motherhood and marriage.
To an existence that had no necessary connection to men. And that brings us back to that opening scene.
The little girls who under the spell of Barbie turn away from motherhood, from caring for their baby dolls, and instead begin to destroy them, It all goes with everything else in the film.
Play has a purpose. It prepares children for adulthood.
Young animals engage in play based on their behaviors that they’ll need as adults.
So it’s not an accident that girls by nature have always played with baby dolls.
It’s preparation for motherhood So what does it mean to have a movie aimed at children?
Where the girls who turn from they turn from caring for and nurturing their dolls, they begin destroying and smashing their dolls.
If caring for a baby doll corresponds to the caring of a baby, then what does the smashing of a baby doll correspond to.
It corresponds to the destruction of babies.
It’s no accident that the same generation that turned against marriage and motherhood pioneered the killing of over sixty million babies in abortion.
It was only about ten years after Barbie came on the scene that abortion on demand began in America.
In the opening of two thousand one, the apes that have been lifted up by the monolith end up using bones to beat enemy apes to death.
A kind of chilling scene. But the opening of Barbie is even more chilling because it represents the smashing, not of an enemy, but of one’s own baby.
What do you think that seed that was planted in the minds of girls who watched that scene in that movie?
Will give birth to. Will they be more likely or less likely to value motherhood in babies, more or less likely to have abortions?
And that goes back to Ishtar.
Ishtar in her Finition incarnation or a start, in the Bible as Ashtora, was also linked to the smashing of babies to child sacrifice.
In fact, some believe that her cult of prostitution helps apply the cult of child sacrifice.
And this goes back to something I revealed in the return of the gods.
That the ancient spirits are first identified in the Bible as the Shaddim in Hebrew.
Behind the gods where the Shadeem means spirits, as in ishtar, but the word Shadeem in Hebrew is linked to the word for destruction.
The Shadeem the god the spirits were the destroyers.
Their aim is to destroy, and their strategy is to cause individuals or societies to destroy themselves.
And the way they do it is to remove purpose.
Men from Manhood, women from Womenhood, marriage from marriage, boys from boyhood, girls from girlhood, child, children from childhood, and mothers from motherhood.
When you remove purpose, it leads to destruction.
In the book, I wrote that the gods are always focusing on the young, the children, because when you get the children, You’ve got the culture, and you have the future.
When you remove the purpose of children, then you can destroy marriage, family, gender, a culture, a nation of civilization.
It’s no accident that we now have a movement to transition girls into boys and boys and girls.
And what more self destructive act than to cause individuals to destroy their own babies, their children, the fruit of their lives, their future.
That’s exactly what these spirits did in ancient times. When Israel turned away from god, it’s written.
They caused their children to pass through the fire. They offered them up. Spashed babies. Think about it.
Motherhood and the maternal instinct is vital for life.
If you destroy that or even weaken it, what is it gonna lead to?
It has to lead to death, and so it did back then, and so it will now.
The scripture says we wore not against flesh and blood, but against powers, principalities.
And this is part of it. Don’t be blind to what is taking place.
And if the propaganda or attack is sugar coated, That doesn’t make it any less dangerous.
It makes it more dangerous, poison that is candy coated is more than poison that is not.
Parents, it’s your charge, and your responsibility to guard your children your sons and your daughters from any harm, whether by television, the school system, or the movies.
You would not give your children candy coated poison. Don’t Take them to see such things.
And even if they can’t understand why, stay in your homes until the plague has passed the land, the pink plague, and if they have seen it, or similar things, then talk to them.
Administrative the antidote, What is the antidote?
The gods and spirits came in into the vacuum of god’s absence. The antidote is the presence of god.
Don’t lead them to the Barbie movie. Lead them to god.
Only in god can you find the purpose of womanhood, manhood childhood life?
Only in god, can you find the purpose of your own life in Messiah, yeshua. Jesus.
He said, he said, let the little children come to me and don’t keep them away.
For such as the kingdom of god.
He is still the answer, still the way, still the truth, still the light, still the one who gives life, meaning, and purpose.
If you want others to see this message, press like.
And if you don’t want to miss the messages that are going to be coming from this site, press subscribe.
And also check out the face page with my name on it, and hopeoftheworld dot org.
Until next time, this is Jonathan Khan saying stay strong in the lord.
And in the power of his might, shalom.
I’m Jonathan Khan, and I hope you were blessed with the video.
Make sure you hit the subscribe button and tap the bell icon so you’re notified every time a new video is posted.
Feel free to share your reactions with your comments and how you were blessed and share video with your friends.
Thanks for watching, and I’ll see you next time.
- The Power of Your But | Jonathan Cahn SermonTháng bảy 8, 2023